Showing posts with label Ross MacLean. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ross MacLean. Show all posts

Sunday, 8 April 2012

U18 Predictions

The Under-18 World Championship kicks off Thursday, April 12th but teams begin their exhibition schedules this weekend.  Here is a look ahead, some players to watch and some "bold" predictions on how the event could unfold:

Canada – Always an interesting blend of talent from teams no longer participating in the CHL playoffs, Canada is hit or miss at this event.  The team should be deep and hard working with strong mobile defense and quality competitive goaltenders.  Canada has assembled a strong roster that should be able to compete with all teams during the tournament and while lacking a lot of star power up front the group they have should build strong chemistry and rely on a score by committee strategy that could take them very far.

Prediction – Gold

Prospect to Watch: Matt Dumba – A potential top 5 pick in this year’s NHL draft, Dumba captained the Canadian U18 team to victory at this past summer’s Ivan Hlinka Memorial and will look for a repeat performance.  A very dynamic and explosive defender, Dumba can dominate the ice with his physical play but is also a very exciting offensive player as well.  Watch for Canada to rely on his massive one timers from the point on the PP.

Keep an eye on: Sam Reinhart – Reinhart is the youngest of the 3 sons of former NHLer Paul Reinhart.   Reinhart was one of the youngest players in Canadian Major Junior hockey this season but still managed to score at a near point per game pace and should take home the WHL rookie of the year award.  He is not eligible for the NHL draft until 2014 and is already projected at being a top pick.



Czech Republic – Their marquee talent, Radek Faksa remains entrenched in the CHL playoffs with Kitchener and is likely not going to be available for this tournament (barring a quick exit and recovery from a concussion sustained in round 1).  The Czechs have some skill up front and some very good puck moving defenders.  In goal, Marek Langhamer is capable of stealing some wins.  Depth is what holds the Czechs back right now, but expect them to matchup surprisingly well with just about everyone.

Prediction – 6th

Player to Watch: Petr Sidlik – A slick and intelligent defender, Sidlik has great instincts and while not overly blessed in the size department he is very good at breaking up plays and starting his own.  Sidlik should anchor a decent defensive group for the Czechs that also includes promising 95 born defender Jan Kostalek.  Sidlik should devour ice time for the Czechs and will be a major reason for any success they achieve during this event.

Keep an eye on: Martin Prochazka – He has great size, protects the puck well and can be near impossible to intimidate physically.  Prochazka isn’t always the most consistent player but when he’s on he is a very appealing power forward.  A strong performance at this event would help him showcase his very good pro-potential.



Denmark – A consistently improving program, this tournament is another great step in the right direction for Danish hockey.  They continue to produce well rounded rosters with more and more top level talent.  Denmark is doing a lot right with their hockey program but will continue to require patience as they aren’t quite ready to solidify their top group status at this level.  Expect them to go to the wire with a competitive Latvian team for relegation.

Prediction – 10th - relegation

Player to Watch: Oliver Bjorkstrand - A 1995 birthdate, Bjorkstrand has been a mainstay with the U20 team this year and has produced goals at that level as well as in Denmark’s top men’s league.  He will be heavily relied on to produce offensive chances for the Danes if they have any hope of being competitive and avoiding relegation.  Speedy and dynamic, he has NHL draft potential for next season and continues to show strong development.

Keep an eye on: Mads Eller and Bjorn Udall – Udall is a very underrated and unheralded blueliner.  He has good size, moves well and can add some offensive kick from the backend.  He should see heavy minutes for the Danes and be relied on in all situations.  He will, however, need to put on a serious show to solidify any thought of him being an NHL draft pick at this point.  That being said, he is talented and developing very well making him worth a long hard look.  Eller is a 95 born player, and is the younger brother of Montreal forward Lars.



Finland – Finland is in an interesting predicament.  They are loaded with young talent and could put together a very competitive team.  The problem is some of their young stars are playing for teams that remain in league playoff battles.  Olli Maatta (London Knights) and Teuvo Teravainen (Jokerit) both look set for long playoff runs with their club teams, meaning they will not be made available for the tournament.  Finland remains a country with tremendous depth of talent though and should still provide a stern challenge for the medals.

Prediction – 5th

Player to Watch: Rasmus Ristolainen – An October 1994 birthdate, Ristolainen isn’t eligible to be drafted until next year, but would garner a lot of consideration if he were eligible this year.  He’s a very intelligent and physical defender who plays the game with the maturity of a man several grizzled years his elder.  He has good offensive upside as well and along with Ville Pokka should run the backend for the Finns.

Keep an eye on: Sasha Barkov – Another tremendously talented Finn, Barkov became the youngest player to score a goal at the World Junior Championships in December.  Not eligible until 2013, Barkov is a top 10 talent at this point and could even be considered as a top pick candidate.  Already playing against men, Barkov is a dynamic and powerful and should be one of the focal points of the Finnish attack, especially if Teravainen isn’t made available to join.



Germany – The German program continues to grow and while still not able to get over the hump of the elite teams, the IIHF’s new relegation scenarios should prove a major benefit to Germany who suffered years of up and down promotions and relegations.  This year’s crop should be competitive, well coached and versatile but should also give glimpses into the bright future of German ice hockey.  The 1995 crop of German players has shown a lot of promise for a program that will start to reap the benefits of consistency moving forward.

Prediction – 8th

Player to Watch: Marvin Cupper – Cupper was magnificent for Germany last year during this event and was the major reason Germany was able to compete with the top teams while hosting this event last year.  A bit undersized, Cupper is deceptively athletic and quick.  His technique is very strong and he plays a very aggressive and challenging style.  Felix Potvin comes to mind when watching the young German netminder.  He is an underrated netminder who will need some more grooming but his development path has proved very strong.

Keep an eye on: Leon Draisaitl – A late 95 born power forward in the making, Draisaitl is one of the most exciting German prospects in years.  He’s a good skater who plays a high tempo style game and can bring a bit of an edge at times as well.  He has excellent scoring potential and if he can continue to show good work ethic in his development he could prove to be a serious top prospect in 2014.



Latvia – Latvia suffers greatly from not having Zemgus Girgensons available for this tournament as he remains committed to his USHL club as their season continues.  There is still reason for optimism for the Latvian’s though as three of their U20 top scorers are eligible to play in this tournament as well.  Teddy Blueger, Nikita Jevpalovs and Robert Lipsbergs should make a up a more than capable top line for the Latvian’s, but will have to be on overdrive to push the Latvian’s out of the bottom group.  Overall their program seems to be on the up, but it’s still not enough.  Expect them to battle it out with Denmark for relegation.

Prediction – 9th

Player to Watch: Teddy Blueger – Teddy as he’s known when he suits up for Shattuck St. Mary’s, or Teodors his true Latvian name, is an intelligent and opportunistic two-way forward.  He prefers to be an offensive contributor and should be relied on in that role during this tournament but his draft appeal lies on his ability to play against top players from other countries and not only score but keep them in check as well.  Projected as a later pick for the draft, this is a big tournament for Blueger and he needs to perform well (not just number-wise) to justify the hype around him.  Blueger is no stranger to some of the competition having played at Shattuck with players like Nathan MacKinnon and Oscar Dansk.

Keep an eye on: Rihards Bukarts – This kid isn’t eligible to be drafted until 2014 (December 31, 1995 birth date) but already has shown a nice blend of size, skill and work ethic worthy of note.  As one of the youngest players in the tournament, Bukarts will likely find himself in a secondary offensive role which should allow him to find some success and showcase his abilities.



Russia – No Yakupov, no Grigorenko....no problem, Russia has a wealth of young talent that can electrify, impress and compete.  Surely they will miss their top stars (Grigorenko still in CHL playoffs, Yakupov a late 93 who is too old this year) but they have plenty of offensive depth and young stars that have shown well internationally.  Chances get a serious boost if Quebec has a quick exit from CHL playoffs in round 2, but that seems unlikely.

Prediction – 4th

Player to Watch: Andrei Vasilevski – The highly touted Russian netminder is about as much of a veteran of this tournament as one could possibly be.  Entering his 3rd U18 championship as Russia’s starter, Vasilevski is still riding the high his WJC performance afforded him.  A big and confident goaltender, Vasilevski needs to assert himself one more time as he battles with Oscar Dansk and Malcom Subban as the potential top goaltending prospect for this year’s draft.

Keep an eye on: Valeriy Nichuschkin and Bogdan Yakimov – Russia continues to produce superior offensive talents and both Nichuschkin and Yakimov fit that mould.  Both have been excellent contributor’s with Russia’s U18 program all year long, and while neither is eligible for the NHL draft until 2013, they should be the muscle in Russia’s offensive punch, filling the void of the aforementioned stars who can’t participate.



Sweden – On paper, Sweden looks stacked.  They have high end talent and reliable depth at every position.  They boast a plethora of potential top round NHL draft picks over the next couple of drafts and should prove to be a formidable opponent for all who stand in their way.  If anything their one downfall will be how they react to playing high energy, physical and gritty opponents like Canada and the US.  If Sweden can keep opponents from dictating the pace, tempo and style of games they play, they could potentially walk through this tournament.

Prediction – Silver

Player to Watch: Oscar Dansk – Sweden has a very deep roster, riddled with talent and potential high end picks, but the success of their team will fall on the shoulders of Dansk.  Dansk is, in my opinion, the best and most underrated goaltending prospect available for this year’s draft but not everyone is on board with that idea.  If Dansk can showcase his abilities and potential and lead this very capable Swedish team to a top 2 finish, you can bet his stock will start to ease into the realm that it truly belongs.   Dansk has good size, great focus and excellent athleticism.

Keep an eye on: Calle Andersson – Forsberg, Bystrom and Collberg are all likely first or at least early second round picks this year, but Andersson is truly interesting.  He’s not far off the abilities of Bystrom and could push his way up the draft charts with a strong performance during this tournament.



Switzerland – In recent years the Swiss have boasted rosters sprinkled with supreme talents such as Nino Niederreiter and Sven Baertschi.  This year’s squad doesn’t necessarily have that benefit, however it may be a roster with more depth than years past.  Switzerland will likely be the most mysterious team in this tournament and their final standing in this event could come down to how the bounces fall.

Prediction – 7th

Player to Watch: Christoph Bertschy – Bertschy saw major minutes in crucial situations for the Swiss U20 team at the WJC and there is no reason that he won’t be in a similar situation in this event.  He is an offensive presence that tends to sway more towards finisher than playmaker but he does have some playmaking talent as well.  The name of Bertschy’s game is creation, as very few players find themselves with as many scoring chances as he does.  Switzerland’s result in this tournament could be a direct result of how Bertschy executes in those situations he creates.

Keep an eye on: Phil Baltisberger – Another late 95 with tons of potential, Baltisberger was a member of Switzerland’s WJC team this past December/January and while he did not see a ton of ice time, his appeal was obvious with minimal evaluation required.  A big mobile and strong defender, Baltisberger has a great head for the game, can fire the puck but is most valuable because of his quick and reliable thinking in all situations.



USA – The US has dominated this event over the past decade and always seems to be the favorite coming in, however this year that’s not the case.  The US will once again ice a very competitive and talented team but on paper they fail to match up to years past and with the other top nations at this event.  The US will find most of their success starts with their very deep stable of defenders.  Trouba, Jones and Skjei will log huge minutes and will have to be on top of their games to push this team back towards glory.  All that being said, expect surprise performances from their forward group and a tight battle in the top 5 teams for the US.

Prediction – Bronze

Player to Watch: Jacob Trouba - Considered one of the top defensive prospects for this year’s NHL draft, the competition is tight to see who will be the first defender chosen.  Trouba is well in that mix.  A strong mix of size, grit and skill, Trouba leads a strong American defensive unit that will be relied on heavily if the US is going to challenge for top spot in this event and has an excellent opportunity here to solidify himself as the most valuable draft eligible defender heading into the draft.

Keep an eye on: Seth Jones - Jones is another prospect to keep an eye on, he will also anchor the US blueline and is a potential 1st overall candidate for next year.  He has tremendous size and proves to be tremendously athletic (as would be expected from the son of a former NBA star).  He plays a very calculated game and can be dominant in all three zones on the ice.  He has the potential to win the top defenseman award at this event (on paper he will likely be up against Trouba and Dumba).

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

Revisiting different point systems for NHL standings - pre playoff edition

The point system in place now for the NHL is not ideal and doesn't optimally indicate who the best teams are.

Since my original blog on the idea of a 5 point system I have had a ton of feedback, and I've made alterations but also included some of the other options I've discussed with people.

A 3 points system seems easiest (but not necessarily best), each game would have a 3 point value on it.  A regulation win is 3 points, a regulation loss 0.  An OT or shootout win would be worth 2 points, while a loss in an extra frame only worth 1.  Clean, simple, easy to compute, but OT and SO being worth the same still irks me a bit.  The earlier a game ends indicates which team was better on a given night, and how much better.  Winning in a game should be worth more than winning in a skills display.

Hence the 5 point system.  I like the idea of all games being equal in points given out, so I have made an ammendment which actually makes more logical sense.  The idea of the 5 point system would be this:
Regulation win - 5pts
Overtime win - 4 pts
Shootout win - 3 pts
Shootout loss - 2 pts
Overtime loss - 1 pt
Regulation loss - 0 pts

This system would reward the teams for winning earlier as it takes more skill to win a game in regulation then in an extra period or shootout.  On the same side, teams should be rewarded for how long they can hang in with the winning team.  It is much harder and the teams are obviously more equal on that particular day the more frames are needed to decide a winner.  This system would also put a huge benefit to teams who go for it in overtime as opposed to playing for a shootout.  Think two division rivals in overtime, you can go for a shootout win and gain 1 extra point over your rival, or go for it in OT and gain 3 extra points.

The biggest knock on the 5 point system is how hard it would be and how much math would be required to just calculate the totals for the average fan sitting around having a beer and knocking back another slice of pizza with their friends.  Records would likely have to be displayed in order of points: Regulation Wins - Overtime Wins - Shootout Wins - Shootout Losses - Overtime Losses - Regulation Losses.  For example the Rangers record now would read 38-8-4-5-2-22.  Which seems quite complicated, especially since now we normally display recirds as 50-22-7.  That is a tough sell.

Where the 5 point system picks up steam, is in the amount of points that teams get for losing games.  It is much lower.  In the current system, Florida has 18.68% of their total points from losses.  Carolina and Montreal are over 20%.   In the current system Florida is up by 3 points on Washington.  That will require wins in Washington's final 2 games to pass the Panthers.  However, in a 5 point system they still only trail by 3 points.  Something that is made up in a single winning game.  Washington has actually won 3 more games than Florida this year, so that 18.68% points from losses could in fact get the Panthers into the playoffs over a team that has performed better.

Not trying to take anything away form the Panthers, who could still end up the better team in all 3 point systems but the standings should be a lot closer than they actually are.  Buffalo who is also right behind those two teams would actually stand to get hurt the most by another system.  Right now they are 2 points those very same Capitals, but with a higher percentage of their point total coming from losses, they would end up 4 points back in a 3 point system and 9 back in a 5 point system.  This has massive implications, because the Sabres have a game in hand on the Capitals.  A single win and they are notted up with the Caps as opposed to having to win at least 1 game plus in the other systems.

In the West, it's even more prevelent, and again, a playoff spot could be determined because of it.  Currently San Jose sits 8th, a single point ahead of 9th place Dallas.  In a 3 point system, they would sit tied, both with 120pts.  In a 5 point system, Dallas would actually be 4 points up on San Jose.  The reason for this is again the amount of points acquired by San Jose in losses as compared to Dallas.  Dallas has the 3rd lowest percentage of points gained from losses in the entire NHL, at 5.62%.  Only Detroit (5.05%) and Boston (4.08%) have lower scores.  San Jose on the other hand, hovers just above the league average (11.04%) at 11.11%..  That translates to 5 points for Dallas, and 10 for San Jose in the current system.

Also in the West, St. Louis would be the number one seed by almost 2 wins in every system except the current one, where they are actually 1 point behind 1st place Vancouver.  Might not seem like a big deal now, but what if the Blues have to put up with the Green Men in game 7 of the conference finals?

All in all it might seem like a lot of fuss to make for some very small changes in the standings, but the fact is there is a ton riding on those subtlties and the current system fails to reward the absolute best performing teams throughout the season.

Wednesday, 28 March 2012

Updated Team Canada Shortlist - March 28

Several teams have now been eliminated from the CHL playoffs cutting down the list for Team Canada at the U18 World Championships.

Here is an updated depth chart for players deserving consideration:

Forward
1. Sean Monahan or Brendan Gaunce (Guaranteed one of these players, barring injury)
2. Charles Hudon (unlikely, considering Chicoutimi has a 3-1 series lead at this point)
3. Scott Laughton (in a tough series with Niagara, winning would be an upset, he should be here)
4. Jarrod Maidens (Attack will likely get eliminated, currently down 3-1 but Maidens hasn't played in a long while and likely won't start at the U18s)
5. Gemel Smith (Maidens teammate on the Attack is a lock to make the team should they fall soon)
6. Kerby Rychel (Down 3-0 to London, expect Warren's kid to be there)
7. Mike Winther (Already eliminated, should be on the team)
8. Troy Bourke (Cougars didn't qualify for the playoffs, Bourke should be on the team)
9. Tom Wilson or Scott Kosmachuk (Close series, one or the other likely a lock in a similar role)
10. Sam Reinhart (Will lead the youth movement when Ice finish up against top seed Oil Kings)
11. Andreas Athanasiou (Highly unlikely London blows their 3-0 series lead, don't expect him to be there)
12. Matia Marcantuoni (Injured but talking about coming back soon, even so Kitchener has a 3-1 lead over Owen Sound and isn't likely to give up the series)
13. Brendan Leipsic (Up 3-0 to Kelowna, Leipsic's Winterhawks will move on and Leipsic won't be in Brno)
14. Brandon Magee (Royals lost their series tonight, but Magee remains on the injured list with an undisclosed ailment, if he's healthy he should be included, big asterix here for now)
15. William Carrier (Cape Breton got thrown to the Sea Dogs, Carrier has good potential to be one of the only Q representatives on this team)
16. Chris Marchese (Windsor is clinging on but London is too strong, Marchese has a real shot after strong second half of OHL season)
17. Matthew Campagna (Sudbury is done, Campagna a serious consideration for Canada)
18. Coda Gordon (Swift Current didn't make the playoffs, I'm not huge on him, but Hockey Canada may disagree with me....it's happened before)
19. Christophe Lalancette (Acadie-Bathurst is on the bubble of elimination, Lalancette could be a consideration)
20. Steven Hodges (Royals are out, Hodges deserves debate)
21. Ryan Olsen (Could be anywhere from 16 to 21 on this list, Blades are out, Olsen on the bubble at least)
22. Branden Troock (People love him, he's got a shot and his team is done)
23. Carter Rigby (Good character player, would be an asset in short term competition, team down 0-3 to high powered Portland)
24. Tyrel Seaman (Surprisingly up 3-1 over 3rd seated Calgary, bubble either way)
25. Chandler Stephenson (Down 3-1 to 2nd seed Moose Jaw, a real possibility)
Other bubble forwards: Alex Forsberg, Morgan Klimchuk, Connor Honey, Zane Jones, Anthony Mantha

Defense
1. Matt Dumba (lock, likely captain as well)
2. Morgan Rielly (injured but talking comeback, too bad for Canada Moose Jaw is up 3-1 and likely moving on even if he is ready to play)
3. Griffin Reinhart (not likely with top seed Oil Kings having their way with Kootenay)
4. Matt Finn (Guelph in a serious battle with Plymouth, underdogs but too close to call so far)
5. Derrick Pouliot (Unlikely, team up 3-0 and heavily favored)
6. Adam Pelech (Count him in)
7. Ryan Pulock (Up 3-1 in potential upset series win, don't rule him out yet, but chances of him playing for Canada are fading)
8. Damon Severson (Down 0-3, strong shot at being named to team)
9. Gianluca Curcuruto (Team is out, he had a strong showing at summer U18 camp, good shot here)
10. Eric Roy (Same situation as Pulock)
11. Brett Kulak (In a big series battle with Spokane, currently all knotted up, keep an eye out)
12. Jesse Graham (Niagara has their hands full right now but is favored to move on)
13. Aaron Ekbald (Barrie is knotted up with the Majors 2-2, Ekbald gets serious consideration should Barrie lose out)
14. Josh Morrissey (Already out, chances are slim...but you're saying there's a chance)
15. Reid Gow (Spokane is tied 2-2 with Giants, in the conversation if they can't pull it out)
Other bubble defenders: Nic Walters, Darnell Nurse, Matt Murphy, Cole Wedman

Goaltenders
1. Chris Driedger (Hitmen facing elimination, Driedger should be the starter for Canada if they don't come back, however not everyone is as high on him as I am)
2. Matthew Murray (The Soo is out, Murray has a lot of fans since the Top Prospect Game, battle between top 4 goalies will be tight)
3. Francois Tremblay (Pretty strong shot at making this team either way, team is already out)
4. Daniel Althsuler (Already backstopped Canada to one U18 Gold Medal, showing very well in OHL playoffs which could make point moot if Oshawa upsets Niagara)
5. Brandon Whitney (Likely the odd man out of just the debate, but anything can happen, team was upset in 1st round of Quebec league playoffs....every team could use a Martimer....)
Bubble Goalies: Dominic Graham

Tuesday, 20 March 2012

Why the NHL needs a 5 point system for wins...

The NHL is one of the only sports worldwide that uses a point system to determine it's standings.  The NHL has evolved greatly over the past few years, with great innovative thinking and bold decision making.  Yet the point structure in which deteremines standings and playoff positions is severely flawed.

Stay with me on this.

A team that wins in regulation is a team that has accomplished something much more desirable than a team that has won in overtime or a shootout.  It takes more skill and deserves far better compensation to dispatch an opponent in regulation time than in an extended match.  It also takes more skill to win a game in an extra period as opposed to a shootout.  Team's playing for shootouts should not be rewarded for cowering by receiving the same amount of points a team who lost in an overtime period by being bold and going for it.

Here is what I propose.  It might be novel, it might be idiotic, it might be something already thought of and thrown out, but it's something.

Win a game in regulation - 5 pts
Lose a game in regulation - 0 pts
Win a game in overtime - 4 pts
Lose a game in overtime - 2 pts
Win a game in a shootout - 3 pts
Lose a game in a shootout  - 1 pt

This structure awards teams who win the game, in whatever fashion.  You will always receive more points for a win.  Where the major difference lies in the consolation given to teams who lose in extra frames.  As stated before, a team who takes a game to overtime should be rewarded, as should a team who takes a game to a shootout.  But they should not be equal compensations.

This system would also get rid of those strange 3 point games we see now.  Sure an overtime game would be a 6pt game, but a shootout game would only be a 4 point game.  This would encourage teams to attack more and be more offensive in overtime periods, making them that much more exciting.  Shootouts would now hold more value too, as one shootout win would be equal to three shootout losses as opposed to the difference of two shootout losses we now see.

Yes this would create some rather complicated high numbers, but it would be a better indication of who the better teams truly are.  I'm sure that's worth the math.  The biggest benefit of this situation is that it stops rewarding teams for losing.  The percentage of points earned in losing efforts would decrease significantly.

As of Feb 29th NHL teams had accumalated almost 11 percent of their points from losses.  If the 5 point system was applied that number shrinks to 3.94%.  Carolina, the worst offender, had almost a quarter of their points (21.31%) from losses.  The lowest percentage in the league, Detroit at 3.45%, was the only team to be under what the league average would be in the 5 point system.

And while the standings wouldn't change dramatically, there would be subtle changes.  For example, on Feb 29th, the Maple Leafs stood 3 points behind Winnipeg.  A deficit that would require at least 2 games to make up.  While in the 5 point system, they were only 5 points back of Winnipeg, a deficit that would require only a single regulation win...well maybe the Leafs weren't a great example to use...(sorry Leaf fans, couldn't resist).

The point is, the gaps are more realistic representations of actual game play achievement in a 5 point system. 

I will revisit this again at the conclusion of the season to see if it makes that much of a difference in the playoff structure.